Category: Health

Pfizer’s Secret Documents Reveal that their COVID Vaccine Actually Made You 8.7% More Likely to Get COVID

By STEVE KIRSCH

Buried in the documents that Pfizer wanted hidden from public view for 75 years there was a table that revealed that their vaccine actually had negative efficacy.

Executive summary

Do you think they would have kept this data secret from the public if it showed good news? Heck no!

The table showed that Pfizer only had around 50% protection if you just take the table at face value. But if you interpret the table correctly, it shows Pfizer had negative efficacy.

In this article, I’ll show you how to properly interpret that data and get the truth.

The method was first disclosed by Jikkyleaks on May 24, 2022.

I recently became aware of it after independently replicating his work. I believe his numbers are slightly off, so I’ll show you the proper calculation for the correct estimate of the case counts.

No doubt about it; those who took the shots were more likely to be infected by COVID by 8.7%.

There is just no other way to interpret the Pfizer data. It’s “gold standard” clinical trial data.

The overall counts are too small for the result to be statistically significant. But the FDA should NEVER be approving a vaccine where the primary endpoint efficacy (reducing cases vs. the unvaccinated group) is so small to be statistically insignificant.

In plain English, the best estimates are that there were actually more infections in the vaccine group than the placebo group. Whoops!

This is a major failing of the FDA to recognize this.

It won’t be long before Senator Ron Johnson brings this to their attention.

Here’s how you show that the Pfizer data means the vaccine had negative efficacy

But it wasn’t even 50% efficacy!

If you got the shots, you’re less likely to develop N-antibodies when infected.

It’s right there in this paper, co-authored by NIH and Moderna.

NIH/Moderna paper: They looked at 700 people who had a confirmed COVID infection, 93% of unvaxxed developed N antibodies; but only 40% of vaxxed developed N-antibodies.

So the infections in vaccinated were “undercounted” if you just relied on the N-antibodies which is by far the best measure of whether you got a COVID infection after the start of the RCT (since everyone in the trial was tested both before and after they got their jabs).

Now let’s do the math to estimate the ACTUAL number infected in each cohort

unvaxxed = 160 /.93 = 172 infected

Vaxxed 75/.4 =187 infected

So now we know. The vaccine made you 8.7% more likely to be infected in the 6 month trial.

This is why they concealed this data from the public.

And since the CFR went up by 9% as well for 1 year post vaccine rollout, we should be able to ascribe approximately 17% of the total COVID deaths as being directly caused by the vaccine based on the RCT.

Estimating the damage toll

3 per thousand vaccinated died from jab related conditions: 800K lives

17% increase in the COVID death toll on 720K deaths = 122K lives

So almost 1M lives lost in just the first 2 years from the shots.

A possible explanation

He argues that the seroconversion wouldn’t be lower if you just got one shot to account for the infection period after shot #1.

Summary

We’ll finally get to see it with Senator Ron Johnson asking them to produce it.

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/pfizers-secret-documents-reveal-that

Male Mosquitoes to be Genetically Engineered to Poison Females with Semen in Australian Research

By Petra Stock

Approach could be used to limit outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases, such as dengue fever, which results in 390m cases annually worldwide

Toxic male mosquitoes will poison females with their semen in a new population control method developed by Australian researchers.

The method involves genetically engineering males to produce spider and sea anemone venom proteins, which they inject into females during mating, reducing their lifespan.

Macquarie University researchers have been testing the “toxic male technique” in a species of mosquito that spreads dengue fever, Zika and other viruses, after a study using fruit flies was published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Communications.

The lead author, Sam Beach, said the species-specific approach could be used to quickly suppress outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases, such as dengue fever – which results in 390m cases worldwide each year – without having to spray huge amounts of insecticides that can decimate local insects.

“Ideally, what we’re trying to achieve is: a male mosquito mates with a female and then she dies immediately,” he said.

Injecting a new gene into freshly laid mosquito eggs using tiny glass needles was “a very tedious process”, he added.

Only female mosquitoes are blood feeders. They generally mate within 24 to 48 hours of emerging but can live and continue biting for several weeks, which enables the continued spread of disease.

The toxic male technique could reduce rates of blood feeding by 40% to 60%, according to the study.

While other genetic biocontrol approaches have used males to reduce the viability, blood-feeding or disease transmitting abilities of mosquito offspring, Beach said the new method targeted females directly.

“With this approach, we can immediately reduce the size of the female mosquito population and then hopefully get a really rapid reduction in the spread of these vector-borne illnesses.”

A University of Melbourne evolutionary biologist, Dr Tom Schmidt, who was not involved in the study, said pesticide resistance was a global problem, prompting scientists to develop other pest management approaches.

“Mosquitoes get resistant to insecticides very rapidly, and they can spread resistance,” he said. “They can evolve it, and they can also spread it by getting on boats and planes and spreading it all over the world.”

An Australian approach that infected mosquitoes with Wolbachia bacteria dramatically reduced dengue fever transmission in northern Queensland, he said. Genetic approaches could also work, he said, noting that mosquito control wasn’t a one-size-fits all approach.

The climate crisis was also causing species of mosquitoes to appear in places where they hadn’t been before.

Prof Philip Weinstein, an infectious diseases researcher at the University of Adelaide who was not involved in the study, said there were thousands of species of mosquitoes but only a few carried diseases.

Weinstein said an ideal solution would be to control the insects without eradicating them, given that mosquitoes were pollinators and an important food source for fish and bats.

“Ecosystem health – things that happen in the environment, including mosquitoes but also water quality, air quality, climate change, biodiversity loss – all impact, either directly or indirectly, human health outcomes,” he said.

Original source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/jan/07/male-mosquito-semen-poison-females-australian-research

EXCLUSIVE: FDA Lab Uncovers Excess DNA Contamination in COVID-19 Vaccines

By MARYANNE DEMASI, PHD

Explosive revelations as a study conducted at FDA’s own lab found residual DNA levels exceeded safety limits by 6 to 470 times. Experts say it’s a ‘smoking gun.’

This is an important article. High school kids working for the FDA discovered excessively high levels of DNA contamination in the shots. They published their findings in a peer-reviewed journal. The FDA isn’t commenting on this. The FDA is NOT warning the public because they don’t want to create vaccine hesitancy. They have no clue about the implications of this work. – Steve Kirsch

An explosive new study conducted within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) own laboratory has revealed excessively high levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

Tests conducted at the FDA’s White Oak Campus in Maryland found that residual DNA levels exceeded regulatory safety limits by 6 to 470 times.

The study was undertaken by student researchers under the supervision of FDA scientists. The vaccine vials were sourced from BEI Resources, a trusted supplier affiliated with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), previously headed by Anthony Fauci.

Recently published in the Journal of High School Science, the peer-reviewed study challenges years of dismissals by regulatory authorities, who had previously labelled concerns about excessive DNA contamination as baseless.

The FDA is expected to comment on the findings this week. However, the agency has yet to issue a public alert, recall the affected batches, or explain how vials exceeding safety standards were allowed to reach the market.

The Methods

The student researchers employed two primary analytical methods:

• NanoDrop Analysis – This technique uses UV spectrometry to measure the combined levels of DNA and RNA in the vaccine. While it provides an initial assessment, it tends to overestimate DNA concentrations due to interference from RNA, even when RNA-removal kits are utilised.
• Qubit Analysis – For more precise measurements, the researchers relied on the Qubit system, which quantifies double-stranded DNA using fluorometric dye.

Both methods confirmed the presence of DNA contamination far above permissible thresholds. These findings align with earlier reports from independent laboratories in the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany and France.

Expert Reaction

Kevin McKernan, a former director of the Human Genome Project, described the findings as a “bombshell,” criticising the FDA for its lack of transparency.

“These findings are significant not just for what they reveal but for what they suggest has been concealed from public scrutiny. Why has the FDA kept these data under wraps?” McKernan questioned.

While commending the students’ work, he also noted limitations in the study’s methods, which may have underestimated contamination levels.

“The Qubit analysis can under-detect DNA by up to 70% when enzymes are used during sample preparation,” McKernan explained. “Additionally, the Plasmid Prep kit used in the study does not efficiently capture small DNA fragments, further contributing to underestimation.”

In addition to genome integration, McKernan highlighted another potential cancer-causing mechanism of DNA contamination in the vaccines.

He explained that plasmid DNA fragments entering the cell’s cytoplasm with the help of lipid nanoparticles, could overstimulate the cGAS-STING pathway, a crucial component of the innate immune response.

“Chronic activation of the cGAS-STING pathway could paradoxically fuel cancer growth,” McKernan warned. “Repeated exposure to foreign DNA through COVID-19 boosters may amplify this risk over time, creating conditions conducive to cancer development.”

Adding to the controversy, traces of the SV40 promoter were detected among the DNA fragments. While the authors concluded these fragments were “non-replication-competent” meaning they cannot replicate in humans, McKernan disagreed.

“To assert that the DNA fragments are non-functional, they would need to transfect mammalian cells and perform sequencing, which wasn’t done here,” McKernan stated.

“Moreover, the methods used in this study don’t effectively capture the full length of DNA fragments. A more rigorous sequencing analysis could reveal SV40 fragments several thousand base pairs long, which would likely be functional,” he added.

Regulatory Oversight Under Scrutiny

Nikolai Petrovsky, a Professor of Immunology and director of Vaxine Pty Ltd, described the findings as a “smoking gun.”

“It clearly shows the FDA was aware of these data. Given that these studies were conducted in their own labs under the supervision of their own scientists, it would be hard to argue they were unaware,” he said.

Prof Petrovsky praised the quality of work carried out by the students at the FDA labs.

“The irony is striking,” he remarked. “These students performed essential work that the regulators failed to do. It’s not overly complicated—we shouldn’t have had to rely on students to conduct tests that were the regulators’ responsibility in the first place.”

The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), which has consistently defended the safety of the mRNA vaccines, released its own batch testing results, claiming they met regulatory standards. However, Prof Petrovsky criticised the TGA’s testing methods.

“The TGA’s method was not fit for purpose,” he argued. “It didn’t assess all the DNA in the vials. It only looked for a small fragment, which would severely underestimate the total amount of DNA detected.”

Implications for Manufacturers and Regulators

Now that DNA contamination of the mRNA vaccines has been verified in the laboratory of an official agency and published in a peer-reviewed journal, it becomes difficult to ignore.

It also places vaccine manufacturers and regulators in a precarious position.

Addressing the contamination issue would likely require revising manufacturing processes to remove residual DNA, which Prof Petrovsky explained would be impractical.

“The only practical solution is for regulators to require manufacturers to demonstrate that the plasmid DNA levels in the vaccines are safe,” Prof Petrovsky stated.

“Otherwise, efforts to remove the residual DNA would result in an entirely new vaccine, requiring new trials and effectively restarting the process with an untested product.”

Now the onus is on regulators to provide clarity and take decisive action to restore confidence in their oversight. Anything less risks deepening the scepticism of the public.

Both the US and Australian drug regulators have been approached for comment.

Original source: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/cp/154176861

Pure Truth and Savagery from Julian Gillespie

By Dave Oneegs Aussie Chat

Julian here states that the public health officials knew that the jobs were killing people and pushed them out anyway.

Calls them “c@nts.”

Click Here To Play Video

Original source: https://t.me/daveoneegsauschat/41016

Often when we try to show people who have questions about the injections why they aren’t safe, we have to recall many different sources and end up overwhelming them with links.

James Roguski has compiled a Resource Center which includes peer reviewed studies, evidence from embalmers, doctors, evidence of increased mortality, and much more.

Thank you to James for this excellent resource!

Resources:
https://t.me/zeeemedia/18773
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/not-safe-and-not-effective

Fico Responded Sharply to Criticism from Zelensky and Threatened to Stop Electricity Supplies to Ukraine

By Intel Slava Z

“I am not your servant”: Fico responded sharply to criticism from Zelensky and threatened to stop electricity supplies to Ukraine.

“I understand that for selfish political reasons the West gives you practically everything you ask for, but I am not your servant who cannot express his own opinion and who is obliged only to help you and not to expect anything from you,” he said.

The Slovak prime minister also added that he would assess the gas situation after January 1 and consider the possibility of retaliatory measures against Ukraine.

“If necessary, we will stop the supply of electricity, which Ukraine desperately needs when the power goes out,” Fico said.

Original source: https://t.me/intelslava/71884

The CDC Reports the First Bird Flu Case with Mutations and Warns we could be Facing “Another Scamdemic”

By Global Economic Forum

Click Here To Play Video

—
http://globaleconomicforum.org

GEF Telegram Channel:
http://t.me/globaleconomic_forum

GEF Rumble page:
http://rumble.com/user/GlobalEconomicForum

Original source: https://x.com/_globaleconomic/status/1872852408709333045

Australian Prime Minister Receives Confirmation: Australian Blood Contaminated

By JULIAN GILLESPIE

.. with synthetic DNA from Pfizer and Moderna

good substack Folk

this morning our team sent a Letter to Russell Broadbent MP and several Senators

Mr Broadbent .. upon reading the Letter .. did not hesitate to inform the Prime Minister of Australia, Tony Albanese

.. and the Minister for Health, Mark Butler

.. and Australia’s Chief Medical Officer, Tony Lawler

of the contents of the Letter confirming synthetic DNA contamination from Pfizer and Moderna

in the blood of Australians

Katie Ashby-Koppens and i worked the Letter up with many Australian and international experts .. who can be seen as the 62 Co-Signatories

.. Professors, Associate Professors, Experts in Genetic Sequencing, Doctors of science, Doctors of medicine, legal experts in this field, and protectors of Australian health rights and freedoms

.. the Letter can be downloaded here

many Senators and their advisors were CCd when Mr Broadbent received the Letter

.. when the Letter was sent to the Prime Minister, Health Minister, and Chief Medical Officer by Mr Broadbent, those same Senators and their advisors were again CCd

yes, the Letter does not only solely rely upon peer reviewed evidence .. it necessarily includes a lot of reproduced/replicated lab results that are being generated almost every other week at the moment

.. lab results which have confirmed data of a most serious nature, that we had to include for sending up the flare

these synthetic DNA sequences are confirmed in the blood

of Australians

.. the same contamination already shown

to integrate with human DNA

.. which may also be ..

self-replicating

one omission occurred when creating the Letter

.. an earlier version shared amongst the Co-Signatories contained a reference to the article by Dr Maryanne Demasi Re the TGA FOIs

Maryanne, our apologies .. my apology

.. this was an omission resulting from haste .. for getting the letter out this morning so close to Christmas

.. good substack Folk, Dr Demasi’s article is of the utmost importance for assisting folk understand the ineptitude of the TGA in dealing with this contamination

synthetic DNA contamination and its consequences

is not the wheelhouse of the TGA

.. never was ..

so we should no longer get too distracted by their misdirection

seeking to have Us look at Them

so they can manage Us with their Spin Doctors

.. like moths .. we should keep away from their flame ..

.. No

the true experts when it comes to what the hell synthetic DNA contamination can do .. and is probably doing .. inside Australian bodies .. is an area of science we always had the real experts for answering

Australian experts Pfizer and Moderna were steered away from

when first seeking approval for their drugs back in 2020

those experts are the members of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee, the same eminent crew of advisors who should have been given the opportunity to advise the Gene Technology Regulator, Raj Bhula .. had Raj not given Pfizer and Moderna a bullsh*t pass to slip out her side door .. and thereby avoid GMO licenses .. and instead proceed directly to the TGA for provisional approval

had Raj Bhula not put this fix in

all Australians would have been told they were being asked

to receive GMOs

.. though more importantly

the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee would have been all over assessing these Pfizer and Moderna products, and would have spent months .. many many months .. receiving outside submissions from the public .. and particularly from other experts in the fields of genomics, gene therapy, molecular biology, and specialists who know a goddamn thing or two about these Transfection products Pfizer and Moderna were spruiking

.. like the Snake Oil Salesmen they are

all of those other non-government experts would have piled-in and collectively told the GTTAC .. and the public ..

“Hell No”

.. not this sh*t

Never This Sh*t

.. so untested

.. so thoroughly dangerous with its prior track record of failure

.. so thoroughly inappropriate for a severe influenza season .. which is all SARS-CoV-2 ever was

.. so

putting to one side our GMO proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna ..

the GTTAC are Australia’s best men and women

for advising

and helping

the Prime Minister

.. and in turn

Australians caught up in this mess

.. and the 62 Co-Signatories in the Letter have so recommended this to the Prime Minister, Health Minister, and Chief Medical Officer .. to consult with the GTTAC, urgently

.. next steps

please know, in the background, many discussions are occurring amongst and with the Senator’s offices seen in the Letter .. and for further sharing the Letter with all other Federal MPs and Senators

.. this must be done in a coordinated manner

.. and given the time of year, please expect to see our efforts revived after Christmas has passed

.. the extended team will also deliver this information to:

all Australian local government Councillors

all State and Territory MPs and Senators

all Australian media

and

.. all Australian and New Zealand Science and Medical colleges and associations

.. your next steps, good substack Folk

Do The Same

download the Letter .. write your own accompanying letter or email .. and send them to your

Commonwealth MPs and Senators

State MPs and Senators

and Your local Councillors

.. and don’t hold back

if you feel some anger

.. or sadness

.. or both

.. vaxxed or unvaxxed

we are all human under the skin

.. and because ..

this crisis smashes everyone

everyone

for now ..

I Wish You All a Happy and a truly Safe and Merry Christmas

.. and I must give a shout out to PJ O’Brien, the good family man and community leader at the helm of the law firm Katie is attached to

.. Thanks PJ .. for your unwavering support and invaluable input

and especial Thanks to our many Co-Signatories for their commitment and attention

.. their empathy and concern for people everywhere

.. Co-Signatories who shared their time and expert focus with Katie and i to get this Letter out so close to Xmas day

good substack Folk .. please share widely & restack if you can

the rest of the World needs to know, too

Original source: https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/australian-prime-minister-receives

Australia: Hundreds of Thousands of Australians with Myocarditis and Other Serious Vaccine-related Injuries

By LauraAboli

Australian Senator Gerard Renick claims the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration is covering up for the government that continues to promote the Covid vaccine, claiming it is safe and effective.

They received the autopsy of a man who died from myocarditis caused by the Pfizer vaccine he received.

They ignore the forensic reports and refuse to acknowledge the side effects of this vaccine.

Click Here To Play Video

Original source: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/65871

Researchers have Never Looked at Autism Onset Rates Post Vaccine in the Short Term

By STEVE KIRSCH

There is only one study that looked at temporal association and it was done 25 years ago. They used broad timeframes (years). Compare that to what a quick survey on X showed.

Executive summary

It NEVER looked at symptom onset rates within 1 week after the shot.

Instead, they used 1 to 2 year timeframes.

Their study showed it took an average of 19 months before first symptoms until a clinical diagnosis was entered into the medical records.

THE STUDY NEVER TALKED TO ANY OF THE PARENTS, they relied exclusively on what is in the medical records.

So what do parents say if you ask them directly? That 90% of the cases happened within 1 week of a vaccine shot.

But what parents say are considered “anecdotes” by the scientific community and what is in the medical records is considered “science.”

This is why there is a huge disconnect between reality and “science.”

The paper

Key table showing a 19 month gap between the age at regression until it was diagnosed officially:

And then they only looked at 1 and 2 year time frames and relied solely on medical records. They never talked to any parent directly to see if the medical records accurately reflected what happened. This is considered high quality research. Why get your feet wet with a little reality?

But when you have a mean of 19 months from onset to diagnosis, most of the cases will naturally be more than a year from the shot which is what they found as you can see below where 138 cases were diagnosed within 24 months of the shot but only 31 cases within 12 months. It’s all because doctors take forever to make a diagnosis, not because onset happen >1 year from the shot.

Here’s what happens when you directly ask the parents what they observe

What happens when you ask parents in PERSON? Nearly every hand in the room goes up!

What happens? Nearly everyone raises their hand about their child having onset within days after getting a vaccine.

If you were at one of these conferences and saw this first hand, please let me know in the comments what happened. And don’t worry, your observation is just an anecdote. 🙂

Here’s the first to reply:

And check out this comment:

Polly Tommey’s statistics (the Vaxxed Bus)

She has nterviewed about 5,000 parents whose kids have autism caused by vaccines.

In all but 2 cases, it happened within 1 week of the shot.

OK, I get there is selection bias because people seeking out Polly are going to believe their child was vaccine injured, but nearly all in under a 1 week?

Come on. If this was coincidence, she’d be seeing cases happening 8 days later, 9 days later, etc. There wouldn’t be this sharp cutoff.

What happens if you post a video of that question being asked?

But that’s just an “anecdote” and “science” says we can safely ignore it, right?

Summary

Nope. They sure don’t.

If you want to reassure us, you should collect the data from parent interviews, not from medical records.

ANYONE can replicate my survey in seconds of effort.

Perhaps someone can explain why my results are so lopsided if there is no connection?

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/researchers-have-never-looked-at